|
|
|
| What's new ? |
|
| Women health mela in Udaypur
Women Rehabilitation Center Udaypur is organizing
Women's health mela focussing on women's gynecological
screening and treatment at different VDCs of Udaypur
district. Two doctors Dr. Narottam Regmi and Dr.
Renu Rajbhandari from Kathmandu were involved
in treatment and screening. This health camp is
organized for one month in different VDCs from
January 10th to February 11th.
Women's health Mela Schedule:
| Date |
Venue (VDC) |
| January 10 and 11 |
Jogidaha |
| January 12,13 |
Hadiya |
| January 14,15 |
Sundarpur |
| January 16,17 |
Beltar |
| January 18,19 |
Triveni |
| January 20,21 |
Katari |
| January 22,23 |
Risku |
| January 24,25,26 |
Bhalaya Dada and Panchawati |
| January 28,29 |
Rauta |
| January 30,31 |
Jalpa |
| January 2,3 |
Saune |
| January 4,5 |
Khabu |
| Febraury 11,12 |
Triyuga Nagarpalika |
Till now the two camps in Hadiya and Jogidaha
is organized. In Joigidaha, one hundred and forty
three women and three men were screened and provided
with free medicines. Similarly in Hadiya, one
hundred and forty four women were screened and
treated. The major problems among women identified
were uterine prolapsed, irregular periods and
also the problems of lower abdominal pain and
white discharge.
|
to the top
Report on National Consultation on Combating
Trafficking: Rationale for Bilateral Agreement
held at Hotel Himalaya from December 10th to
11th.
The trafficking of persons in Nepal is an issue
that has become of increasing concern among NGOs
in the past two decades. According to the UN
Special Rapporteur on violence against women,
trafficking is defined as ‘the recruitment,
transportation, transfer or harboring or receipt
of any person of any purpose or in any form by
the threat or use of force or by abduction, fraud,
deception, coercion or abuse of power for the
purposes of slavery, forced labor or debt bondage’.
Thus, trafficking is seen as a serious violation
of fundamental human rights. Although not a new
phenomenon, with increased migration flows, the
processes of globalization and the recognition
of the inherent gender discrimination in Nepal,
there has been a renewed focus on combating the
exploitation of women and children that is inherent
in trafficking.
When we talk about human trafficking, the demand
from neighboring country India cannot be isolated
with. The open uncontrolled border witnesses
the human trafficking each year. Time and again,
it has been noticed that the extent of trafficking
has been increasing due to the escalating conflict
situation prevailing in Nepal. There are ample
numbers of cases, which show the trafficking
among men, men and children also. The recent
case is the worse conditions of Nepali youth
being trafficked to Iraq. Previously when the
issue of trafficking was concerned, only women
and children indulging into force sexual profession
was dealt with. But right now, it has given clear
distinction between migration and trafficking.
Any people have right to migrate but trafficking
in the process of migration is a gross violation
of human rights.
The human rights safe guards realized that there
is a massive need of bilateral agreement between
India and Nepal to combat the problem of human
trafficking. So, for that WOREC, Himrights and
Plan Nepal jointly organized a 1 and half day
national consultation on "Combating Trafficking:
Rationale for Bilateral Agreement" In that
program, 3 speakers Dr. Renu Rajbhandari, chairperson
WOREC, Dr. Gopal Krishna Sivakoti, Director General
Himrights and Mr. Hari Krishna Karki, Advocate
presenterd papers highlighting the rationale
for the bilateral agreement between Nepal and
India.
The session was divided into two parts. First
session was the speeches by several delegates.
Dr. Gopal Krishna Shivakoti delivered the welcome
speech as well as he threw some lights on the
need of bilateral agreement to prevent human
trafficking. He highlighted the speech by saying ";
Fishing out in the stream of migration is trafficking.
The treaty between India and Nepal in 1950 reflects
about the access for both the Indian and Nepalese
to move over these countries without visas. This
friendly treaty not only accessed the movement
of Nepalese and Indians but also triggers the
trend of human trafficking. But this is not the
only cause of human trafficking. The demand from
India and incapability of Nepalese government
to provide sufficient employment opportunities
to the productive population can be counted for
the major reasons of trafficking.
To tackle this problem, the memorandum of understanding
between both the countries should be there. This
issue is an international issue, so until and
unless the standard levels of strategies are
made, significant change is impossible.
The second speaker Dr. Renu Rajbhandari, chairperson
of WOREC, highlighted that the need for bilateral
agreement between India and Nepal should be the
concern of state, but there has not significant
intervention from the government sectors to combat
human trafficking, which is a gross violation
of human rights. It's been a decade; the issue
of trafficking is talked with. Definitely, There
have been lots of achievements in this field.
To address this issue, 3 things has to be taken
into consideration:
a) Identification of victims
b) Risk assessment
c) Repatriation, Reintegration and recovery
Dr. Renu stressed that to combat this issue
the commitment has to be there in policy and
government side.
Chief guest, Ms. Astha Laxmi Shakya, minister
of women, children and social welfare focussed
that "celebration of days" won't help
if people donot call for action. We have been
celebrating days over a decade still the case
is increasing rather than going down. The effective
laws have to be formulated and also the existing
policies have to be reviewed and amended as per
the need. She committed herself to join hands
to combat this issue.
Padma Mathema, national rapporteur, National
Human rights Commission, stressed the bilateral
agreement, the ultimate solution to fight against
this human right violation.
Ms. Pravha Pandey, from Plan Nepal threw some
lights on the cause of trafficking, which are
economic and social cause. The victims are the
marginalized sections of society. For the bilateral
agreement, initial task would be to spell out
the roles of NGOs and the embassies.
The vote of thanks was delivered by Ms. Jyoti
Paudel, advocacy officer of WOREC.
The most important session was second session
i.e. paper presentation. Dr. Gopal Krishna Sivakoti.
The title of his paper was Countering
Human trafficking with Bilateral Accord". He presented 5 theories
on Convention to combat human trafficking.
a) Zero tolerance to impunity to human trafficking
b) Prevention from Trafficking
c) Protection from trafficking
d) Criminalization, Punishment and Treatment
e) Safe, human and regular mobility.
Dr. Renu Rajbhandari presented paper on "Importance
of Bilateral agreement in SAARC convention".
She highlighted the flaws in SAARC Convention.
The regional strategy to eliminate human trafficking
was developed in 9th SAARC convention held from
12-14 May 1997 at Maldives. Point 27 of this
Convention stated that to combat human trafficking,
the activities have to be planned in a coordinated
way, also to strengthen the existing laws and
also to formulate the laws according to the need.
These conventions had been amended in January
2002.
This Convention has been successful in addressing
vulnerable sections like women and children but
the definition quoted has limited to women and
children only. The commentator was delighted
to express his feelings towards the presentation.
This was a multidimensional draft as said by
him; also it is within right-based approach.
This paper has covered the positive part of SAARC
convention, also highlighted the weakness but
now the definition of trafficking has been broadened
which the paper has not covered.
The third presenter was Hari Krishna Karki,
an advocate. The title of his paper was International
Protocol on Human Trafficking and Nepalese Laws.
There are numbers of flaws in existing laws and
policies. The commentator highlighted the checking
of cross border crime and also1950 treaty has
to be amended. Even 1949 act against trafficking
should also be amended.
In floor discussion, Closing border or regularizing
it won't stop crime against trafficking. If the
border is closed, the same number will get trafficked
but the victims have to bear more torture and
abuses. The closed border between Bangladesh
and India is the clear example of this. It takes
5000 taka to get visa through legal way to travel
from Bangladesh to India. But through illegal
way 50 taka is enough. So border close is not
the solution. The open border reflects the less
torture to the victims rather than the closed
ones.
The second day was half-day program, started
with the queries and concerned of the participants
about the previous day's presentation.
Several points were arisen during the discussions,
which were as follows:
- Before making any agreement, we
should be clear of which level should we address
to, government
level, police level, organizational level,
journalist, parliament or administration.
- The
treaty has to be monitored
- Forceful repatriation
is against right-based approach, so it should
not be.\
- Trafficking definition has to be widened.
- The concept of Supply and demand country
should be broadened.
- This issue has to be dealt
with diplomatic way.
- The poverty is not the
only root cause of trafficking; this concept
has to be changed.
- Both the receiving and the
supply country should make effective agenda
to punish the culprit
involved in trafficking.
- The main need is to eradicate slavery like
condition should be the main focus to make
treaty
for combating trafficking.
The next session is to make the future strategy
for the treaty.
The main things which should not be forgotten
are we donot want our people to be restricted
from being migrated to India and also in Indian
labor business, the demand of Nepali labor class
is high.
The main focus should be there should be clear
identification of victims, the repatriation has
to be voluntarily for that proper risk assessment
is necessary. The strategy for victims and survivors
should be different. There should be healthy
environment for the people who want to migrate
to other countries for employment.
There should be clear assessment of what are
the difficulties both the countries are facing
because of unavailability of this treaty; this
should be clearly examined.
The treaty will add benefits in investigating
the criminal activities.
The next plan of action to move forward
- Research with victims/ survivors/
policy makers
- Series of focussed meeting with
task force, ministry of foreign affairs, home
ministry, women
ministry, meeting with NGOs.
- With the coordination with Plan India
The last session was facilitated by Dr. Gopal
Sivakoti; he sited road map to move further for
bilateral agreement, which were as follows:
There has to be dialogue between
- Home government + Home civil society
- Indian
Civil society + Indian Government
- Home government
+ Indian Government
- home civil society + Indian
government
- Home government Indian civil society
- Home
civil society + Indian civil society
At the end, the one and half day national consultation
ended with the vote of thanks, and also focussing
on the various issues and rationale for the bilateral
agreement between Nepal and India.
|
to the top
| |
A Report on National
Peace Assembly on Conflict, Displacement & Migration: Challenges
for Peace and Development
(26th-28th August)
In an effort to initiate peace campaign nationwide,
three day National Peace Assembly, entitled ‘Conflict,
Displacement and Migration: Challenges for Peace
and Development’, was held in the capital
from 26th to 28th August 2004. The assembly was
launched with the opening session held at Bansantapur
Dabali, during which the political leaders, civil
society, human rights activist joined together
to advocate for establishing peace and security
in the country. For the last nine years, Nepal
has been experiencing escalating political conflict
arising from struggles between the Communist
Party of Nepal (Maoist) and His Majesty's Government
of Nepal. At the session, all the speakers highlighted
the importance of peace talks between Maoist
and government, which would be the only way to
ensure peace and security in the country. The
participants coming from 75 districts equivocally
stressed on the need of restoring peace in the
nation.
Renowned anthropologist and WOREC's advisor Prof.
Kailash Nath Pyakurel chaired the session. Dr.
Renu Rajbhandari, chairperson of WOREC had highlighted
the objectives of the National Peace Assembly.
Several delegates raised their voice to maintain
peace in the country at the occasion. Mr. Gopal
Raj Pahadi, member of Nepali Congress said that
the present conflict could be resolved through
democratic way. Similarly, Jhala N Khanal, member
of CPN UML emphasized that the only way to resolve
the current crisis is peace dialogue. In addition,
Mr. Hridayesh Tripathy, leader of Nepal Sadhvana
Party (Anandidevi) highlighted that the fact
that the conflict has to be resolved politically
constructive manner. Leader, Keshav Nepal from
JanMorcha Nepal stated that mobilization of army
is not the proper way to resolve this present
conflict.
Several human rights activists stressed that
the country should be made weapon free; and all
the people should be ensured with their fundamental
human rights. They equivocally agreed that the
escalation of conflict is due to use of weapon
by both the warring parties.
Other school of thought believed that only the
ordeal and pain is felt by those who have suffered
due to the actions carried out by both the parties.
Participants shared their experience of having
to see mothers carrying their children's dead
body in their lap, yet remaining helpless. They
stressed collective and honest action from all
the sectors to restore back peace in the country.
Mr. Devika Timilsina of Hamro Abhiyan concluded
the session by highlighting the key points and
with the vote of thanks to all the participants.
The second day of the program took place at Staff
College Jawalakhel. More than 500 people participated
in assembly. The session was divided into two
parts; plenary and parallel. In the plenary
session, speakers from different sectors presented
the papers on various issues stated below.
- Conflict, Displacement and Migration and
Women Health Rights : Dr. Renu Rajbhandari
- The Role of Media in Peace Building Process:
Mr. Suresh Acharya
- Possibility and Challenges of Constitutional
Assembly : Mr. Krishna Pokharel
- Conflict, Displacement and Migration
and Youth Rights : Mr. Bhola Dahal
- Present Human Rights Situation and
Challenges :Ms. Shova Gautam
In plenary sessions, there were presentations
of various papers and discussion related them.
The detailed discussions on each issue were scheduled
in the second session. Several parallel workshops
were held on the above mentioned topics to have
thorough discussions.
On the last day of the assembly, moderators
from each symposium presented summary of the
issue based workshops, and group work regarding
subject matter, attempts being done to resolve
the issues, and recommendation/strategy for future
directions.
The assembly was able to generate a 17-points
Declaration for Action in Kathmandu based on
the presentations, panel discussions, and working
groups' outcomes. The 17 points declaration focussed
on the restoration of peace by releasing the
country from the present conflict situation and
also addressed suffering of the civilians due
to this conflict. It also developed the codes
of conduct for the nation as well as for the
Maoist to follow. The assembly concluded with
a mass peace rally in Kathmandu with uniform
voice to ensure peace and security to all.
The Kathmandu
declaration 2004 (MS
Word Version 84kb) was
handed over to Prime Minister Sher Bahadur
Deuba on
7th September
2004.
|
to the
top
|
Civic Assembly
entitled, "Conflict, Displacement and
Migration:
Challenges for Peace and Development" in
Mid-Western and Western Region, 2004
In an effort to initiate peace campaign nationwide, two-day regional
assembly series entitled ‘Conflict, Displacement and Migration:
Challenges for Peace and Development’, were held in Dang, mid-western
region of Nepal on February 23-24th, and Baglung, western region on
March 3-4th, 2004. Prior to the western region assemblies, we had held
an eastern regional workshop in Biratnagar in November. The overall
objective of the workshops was to initiate a peace building process
involving all sectors and initiating grassroots campaign. The specific
objectives were to conceptualize conflict, its impact on different
broad sectors such as youth, women's health, education, media, human
rights, and to marginalized groups as well as daily lives and look
for ways to resolve them collectively. The assemblies held allowed
forum for the community people to voice their opinions who have fallen
aprey to the dire situation of the violent conflict from the state
as well as rebel force.
Preliminary site visits were made both to the
mid-western and western regions by WOREC staffs
to identify local partners and involve the community
people in the planning process. The idea was
to take the assembly in a participatory manner
from the very first step. It was in those preliminary
visits that the community people and local leaders
showed immense interest and took ownership. The
determination for making the assemblies a success,
making financial as well as logistic contributions,
and bringing people together were also made during
the prior assembly meetings. It was only with
such positive interest and welcome from the local
level that we were able to take the idea forward.
The Civic Assembly comprised of a series of
programs over two consecutive days. The structure
of the program remained same in all the three
regions with a slight variation on the issues,
which were region specific chosen by the local
community. The first day events consisted of
inauguration activities, and the presentation
of the paper on conflict by key speaker in the
morning. In the afternoon session, five simultaneous
issue related symposiums were held with a paper
presentation, panel discussion, and working group
activities on each. On the second day moderators
from each symposium presented summary of the
issue based workshops, and group work regarding
subject matter, attempts being done to resolve
the issues, and recommendation/strategy for future
directions.
Challenges, difficulties and predicaments were
shared by the participants in all the assemblies.
The issues were many but overall concerns remained
similar.
The security forces are limited only in the district headquarters and
few rural areas. The community lives in an extreme state of fear, terror
and insecurity. People are dying in lack of health services due to bandhs,
absence of health personnel in the villages or lack of transportation
for timely check ups. Women have become widows, semi-widows, children
orphans and all groups are facing harassments, torture of inhumane nature.
The ruling leaders in the capital and the government representatives
continue to claim that they have arranged security as well as service
delivery systems throughout the nation, but the stories shared by the
community people proves that the reality is otherwise. In some cases
participants were even reluctant to openly talk about their situations
due to fear of the ramifications it could result upon their return to
the community by the Maoists and/or security forces. Youth of the village
are forcefully recruited by the Maoists, and even if they refrain from
joining Maoists they are instead harassed by the security personnel for
harboring Maoists. The villages are being vacant due to forced displacement
as a result of violent conflict. Inhumane and inappropriate behaviors
by the security personnel during security check ups are very insensitive.
The daily lives have been crippled due to harassment from both sides,
declared and undeclared curfews, bandhs, and lack of security in the
communities.
A story shared by a local resident, a guest
of honor and a conflict victim Ms. Jasoda Sharma
in Baglung held the mass in awe and sympathy.
Her husband was taken from the house 2 years
ago by the local army but unfortunately even
to this day the husband is neither released nor
Ms Sharma knows any other news regarding him
including the status of his life. She further
adds, "Worse, I don't even know what I could
tell my children when they ask me whereabouts
of their father"
Similarly, there was another poignant story
shared by a woman in Dang. Her husband was kidnapped
by Maoists. The tragedy being not enough, she
was raped by both the maoists as well as policemen
in group. She has further been harassed verbally,
physically as well as threatened to be killed.
She has sought help from a multiple sectors but
to no avail. There were a number of such inhumane
and atrocious testimonies shared by the participants.
Over 600 participants in both the assemblies
had one voice in common--"We urge the state
and the insurgents to immediately halt the violent
conflict that has accelerated with a dire consequence
of infringement of fundamental human rights including
extra-judicial killings, rampant torture and
involuntary disappearances. The state and the
insurgents should immediately declare ceasefire
in honor of the long-cherished popular thirst
and refrain from protracted conflict keeping
in view that dialoguing is the only alternative
to enhance just peace, human rights and equitable
society"
The local community responded enthusiastically
for holding assembly of this scale in heavy conflicted
areas such as Dang and Baglung. However, in Dang
security personnel were reported to have harassed
the partner organizers upon the completion of
the program. In Dang despite a Bandh scheduled
right after the assembly, people from remote
villages and 15 districts made it to the venue
to appeal for a need to restore peace in nation.
Similarly, in Baglung despite a blockade imposed
by the Maoists on food supplies in place and
transportation blockade scheduled ahead, participants
from 16 districts including remote areas came
to actively partake the assembly.
The assembly was able to generate a 14-points
and 18-points Declaration for Action in Dang
and Baglung respectively based on the presentations,
panel discussions, and working groups' outcomes.
The assembly concluded with a mass peace rally
in Dang whereas in Baglung the program began
with a massive peace rally.
Overall, the assembly was able to achieve the
objective it had set forth. Significant and common
accomplishments for both the assemblies include
formation of youth peace network, determination
of women's group to pressure the state as well
as the rebel parties to bring a violent conflict
to an end, strong recommendations for future
direction on each region specific issues and
the declaration for action for each region.
We will soon hold another regional assembly
in far western region and ultimately a large
scale one in the capital to put a huge pressure
on those in power and the rebel forces to come
to dialogue soonest.
Dang Declaration
for Action…[click
here to see the full text]
Baglung
Declaration for Action…[click
here to see the full text]
|
|
|
|